Welcome to the ultimate showdown – Re20 vs Re320! We’ve pitted these two microphones against each other to see which one comes out on top. It’s time to break down the features and specs of each mic to determine which one is the true champ. So grab your popcorn and get ready for the mic battle of the century!
Overview
The Re20 is a large-diaphragm dynamic microphone while the Re320 is a large-diaphragm condenser microphone. Both mics have a cardioid polar pattern and a low-cut filter. The Re20 has a frequency response range of 45 Hz to 18 kHz while the Re320 has a frequency response range of 30 Hz to 20 kHz.
| Re20 | Re320 |
|---|---|
| Dynamic Microphone | Condenser Microphone |
| Cardioid Polar Pattern | Cardioid Polar Pattern |
| Low-cut Filter | Low-cut Filter |
| Frequency Response: 45 Hz to 18 kHz | Frequency Response: 30 Hz to 20 kHz |
More guides: Are Piano Lessons Worth It.
Pros and Cons
When it comes to picking the right microphone for your needs there’s always the classic conundrum: Re20 vs re320. It’s a classic battle between two pros and two cons. The Re20 is the older classic mic that has stood the test of time while the re320 is the newer mic touting more features and options. So how do you decide which one is right for you? Well luckily there are a few key points that can help you choose between the two.
Pros of the Re20: The Re20 offers a classic sound that can bring clarity to any recording situation. It has good frequency response and its dual-voicings (cardioid and omnidirectional) make it an excellent choice for recording in a wide variety of situations. Additionally the Re20 is often considered to be one of the most reliable mics on the market making it a great investment.
Pros of the Re320: The Re320 has a versatile design and offers a variety of features making it ideal for recording different instruments or vocals. It has a high-frequency boost which can help bring out the details of a voice or instrument as well as low-end rolloff control which can help remove unwanted low-frequency rumble. The Re320 also has a pre-attenuation switch allowing you to tailor the mic to different recording scenarios.
Cons of the Re20: The Re20 isn’t as sensitive as some newer mics and can suffer from unwanted noise pickup in noisy environments. Additionally the Re20 may not have the same presence and sparkle as some of the more modern mics which can make a difference if you’re looking to get the most out of your recordings.
Cons of the Re320: The Re320 can be a bit fussy when it comes to positioning and securing the microphone. Additionally the additional features of the Re320 can prove to be a bit confusing for novice users leading to problems.
At the end of the day it all comes down to your recording needs and what type of sound you want to achieve. Both the Re20 and the Re320 offer different pros and cons so you’ll have to decide which microphone is right for you.
Applications
If you’re wondering what makes the RE20 vs RE320 microphone choice so relevant for some audio aficionados the answer lies in their diverse applications. On one hand the RE20 has classic applications in audio production for broadcast podcasting and audio broadcasting – but its uses don’t stop there. It’s also an excellent choice for tasks that require a dynamic yet full and powerful sound like dialing in a bass guitar amp nearby recording a kick drum or capturing audio ambience of a live music venue.
Meanwhile the RE320 is best-suited for audio recording tasks that focus on clarity detail and precision. This dynamic microphone is the ideal choice for acoustic instruments lead vocals and other sources where the nuance of a performance matters. Due to its clarity it’s also a great choice for studio or remote broadcasts where spoken audio needs to be delivered with definition articulation and a touch of character.
In other words: the RE20 is great for capturing a robust and full-bodied sound and the RE320 excels at catching every small detail in a performance. As it turns out the main difference between these microphones boils down to character… and that’s why there’s no one-size-fits-all choice here. You’ll need to assess your individual needs and decide if you need the extra oomph of the RE20 or the pristine clarity of the RE320.
Comparative Analysis
When it comes to recreating sound both the classic RE20 and the modern RE320 microphones have a lot to bring to the table. So how do you decide which one is the better option for your project? Let’s take a deep dive and explore the features of both mics.
The classic RE20 is a ‘workhorse’ mic in terms of recording. It offers a broad frequency range low self-noise and low distortion. It’s great for radio broadcasting and music recording and even pro-level gaming streams. With its rugged design and stainless steel construction it’s a reliable companion in any recording session.
On the other hand the RE320 modernizes the classic by adding a variable-density filter and a variable-pressure pad that lets you reduce the sound level if need be. With the variable-density filter you can boost frequencies before it goes to the signal chain making it useful for voiceovers vocal and instrumental recordings and theatrical soundscapes. It also comes with a pop filter to reduce plosives.
Both are great options for recording but if you’re looking for a mic with a modern twist the RE320 may be your best choice. It offers more control to recreate different sound effects from the subtlest nuances to the most extreme limits of sound. But if you want an authentic classic sound the RE20 is the way to go. Whichever one you choose you’ll be sure to get a professional-level recording.
Resources